live A fresh scan is scoring a skill map right now
For HR & People teams workforce intelligence, honestly measured

Learning that makes impact.

Report the four things that actually change: how people react, what they learn, what they do, and what it delivers.

The screens are real. The figures on them are illustrative.

The Omie HR overview titled Workforce intelligence: active learners this quarter, average skill mastery by Bayesian Knowledge Tracing, employee eNPS, compliance completion, skills coverage against role targets, an illustrative learning and development value in dollars, a what needs attention panel, a Kirkpatrick learning to value chart, and a compose board pack button.
The actual product
employee eNPS
+12 this quarter
l&d value (Phillips)
$509 illustrative
compliance
75% complete
4
Kirkpatrick levels
Reaction, learning, behavior, results. All four on one screen.
BKT
mastery model
Bayesian Knowledge Tracing, a real reading per skill, not seat time.
1click
board-pack export
The quarter's numbers, composed for your board.

the premise

Completions are not capability.

A completion rate says people clicked to the end. It cannot say what they can do now, or what that is worth. Omie measures the second thing, then prices it.

Four levels that actually matter.

Donald Kirkpatrick named them in 1959, and they still ask the only questions a board cares about. Omie reports all four from live learner activity, not a survey filled in after the fact.

1

Reaction

Did people rate the learning as useful. Employee eNPS and satisfaction, read from the people doing the work, not a smile sheet at the end of a course.

2

Learning

Did mastery actually move. Bayesian Knowledge Tracing turns every answer into an honest reading, so a skill climbs instead of a bar filling.

3

Behavior

Is the skill showing up in the work. Scanned mastery is compared to the band the role should hit, person by person and team by team.

4

Results

What did it deliver for the business. Coverage held, gaps closed, and compliance met, rolled up into one view for the quarter.

Kirkpatrick names the four. Phillips adds the fifth answer a CFO wants: what it delivered, in dollars.

omie/insights

Prove it, in dollars.

Kirkpatrick gives you the four levels. Phillips goes one step further and prices the whole program in dollars. The overview shows both on one screen, and every figure traces back to real learner signals.

  • Levels one to four, scored from live learner activity
  • Phillips ROI as a dollar figure your CFO can read
  • Export the quarter or open the review in one click
The workforce intelligence overview with a Kirkpatrick learning to value chart by level, employee eNPS, compliance completion, and a Phillips learning and development value in dollars labelled illustrative.
The actual product

coverage against role targets

Coverage you can defend.

Every role gets a target band, and every person gets an honest reading. The skills matrix shows where coverage holds, where it thins, and which skills live inside a single head.

  • A heat matrix from the whole org down to one person
  • Coverage against role targets, cell by cell
  • Bus factor flags the skills only one person holds
The Omie org skills matrix: skills tracked with average mastery, coverage measured as cells at or above the role band, critical gaps flagged, and library, heat matrix and bus factor views.
The actual product
omie/happy

eNPS people actually answer.

Level one is only honest when people feel safe answering. Omie runs eNPS and pulse surveys on a cadence you set, and holds results back until enough responses land to keep every answer anonymous.

  • Recurring cadence with reminders, no spreadsheet wrangling
  • Results stay hidden until the anonymity floor is met
  • The trend sits next to learning and behavior on one overview
The Omie employee eNPS screen: a survey with score trend over time, response rate, promoters and detractors, and an anonymity floor before any result is shown.
The actual product

observed vs role expectations

The gaps that need a decision.

A gap is real only when a scanned mastery band sits below the band the role should hit. Nothing is invented. Each row joins live scan results to the targets you set, then proposes the path that closes it.

  • A short list of open gaps, not a wall of red
  • Severity, people affected, and time to close on every gap
  • One click assigns the closing path
The Omie skill gaps screen: open gaps with a band model on a one to five scale comparing observed mastery against the role target, severity per gap, people affected, and an estimated time to close.
The actual product

Real, not invented

The band model compares observed mastery to the role target on a one to five scale. No gap appears without a scan behind it, so the list holds up in a review.

Sparse on purpose

A short, honest list you can act on beats a dashboard of red that people quietly learn to ignore.

the whole loop, animated

Watch a gap close.

A scan lands, a gap gets flagged, a track goes out, and the board view moves. This is the loop, recreated in HTML so you can watch it run.

org skills matrixmastery, 1 to 5

Illustration: a role by skill heat matrix fills in from scan results, one low cell is flagged as a gap, a closing track is assigned, and the cell rises to the role band.

Data storytelling 4 people below the role band
Assign closing track Track assigned
board rollupKirkpatrick, illustrative
L1 Reaction+12
employee eNPS
L2 Learning71%
average mastery
L3 Behavior78%
coverage vs role targets
L4 Results7
open gaps, lower is better

Every figure here traces to a scan or a survey. These ones are illustrative.

An HTML recreation of the screens above, so you can see the loop move. Hover any cell.

This matrix, with your people in it.

Set role targets, run the first scans, and read your own coverage this week. No card to start.

from gap to path

Close it with a track people finish.

Every gap proposes the track that closes it. Tracks run ten minutes a day, tune themselves to each learner, and report progress back into the same coverage view, so you watch the gap close.

  • Assign a closing path in one click, straight from the gap row
  • Adaptive tracks re-tune to every answer, never one size fits all
  • Progress rolls back into coverage and the Kirkpatrick view
The Omie HR tracks screen: learning tracks with cover art, status, assigned learners and completion progress, plus controls to assign a track to a team or role.
The actual product
omie/author

Author a track from one doc.

Your playbooks, policies and product docs become learning. Upload a document and Omie drafts a track across 25 lesson formats, held for your review before anything reaches a learner.

  • 25 lesson formats, from role plays to worked examples
  • Human review before anything ships to a learner
  • Compliance training authored once, tracked against the audit window
The Omie authoring hub: build a track from a document, choose from 25 lesson formats, review drafts before publishing, and route finished tracks to teams.
The actual product
omie/manage

Board-ready, honestly.

Compliance is tracked against the audit window, with reminders and escalation before it closes. When the quarter ends, one click composes the board pack. And on our own paperwork: SOC 2 is in progress, and we say so.

  • Overdue training surfaced before the auditor asks
  • A board pack your leadership can skim in two minutes
  • Every figure traces back to the screens above
ISO 27001Certified ISO 9001Certified SOC 2 Type IIIn progress GDPRReady DPAAvailable
The Omie compliance screen: mandatory training tracked against the audit window with completion status per person, overdue items flagged, and reminders before the deadline.
The actual product
In the board pack What it shows Status
Headcount and active learners Who is in scope and who is actually learning this quarter. available
Learning ROI, in dollars The Phillips value for the program, illustrative until your own data lands. available
Skills coverage against targets Cells at or above the role band, from the org down to one person. available
Open gaps and who is affected Only where a scan sits below a role target. Honest and sparse. available
Compliance status Overdue training surfaced before the audit window closes. available
EU data residency and DPA Available on Business for teams that need it. available
SOC 2 report Our own security attestation. We tell you exactly where we are. in progress

works with your stack

Plugs into your stack.

SAML, SCIM, and the audit stream your IT review will ask about. The team says yes, and IT has nothing to block.

Provisioning · Acme Co. SYNCED
IdP
Okta SAML 2.0acme.okta.com · 247 users
CONNECTED
SCM
SCIM 2.0 syncEvery 60s · last: 12s ago
OK
DIR
Group mappings8 groups · 12 roles · auto-route
3 NEW
LOG
Audit log streamWebhook · Splunk · Datadog
PIPED
OKTAAZURE ADGSUITEONELOGINJUMPCLOUD

Demo tenant. SSO and SCIM ship on the Business plan.

SAMSAML SSO
OIDOIDC SSO
GCalGoogle Calendar
SLKSlack
MSTMicrosoft Teams
SAPSAP SuccessFactors
BHRBambooHR
CSCornerstone
LILinkedIn
ZMZoom

Live today. More on the way. See all integrations.

Ada watches the org signals for you.

“Key-person risk on the data team. Here is the succession move.”

The numbers come with the move that matters.

Meet Ada →

the math, in your own numbers

Run the math on your team.

Three sliders, one conservative model. Every output is illustrative, and the formula is printed under the card so your finance team can check it.

Plug in your team

The outputs update as you drag.

Employees 100
Average fully loaded salary $75,000
Hours saved per week, per learner 2 hrs
Omie cost: $18,000 a year $15 per seat per month ($1,500/mo)
Annual hours value, illustrative
$375,000

Hours back to actual work, priced at the salary you set.

Return multiple, illustrative
20.8×

For every $1 of Omie, $20.8 of time value back.

Payback, illustrative
0.6months

Inside the first billing cycle at these inputs.

3-year value, illustrative
$1,071,000

Net of Omie cost, before any retention effect.

Value = employees × hours per week × 52 × (salary ÷ 2,080). Cost = employees × $15 × 12. A model, not a promise: your own numbers land when your data does.

Read the full ROI report

from our discovery interviews

Three sentences we kept hearing.

We built this page around what HR and L&D leaders told us in research conversations. Roles shown, no invented names, no stock faces.

My LMS says 92 percent complete. My board asks what changed. I never had an answer that connected those two sentences.
HL Head of L&D200-person fintech team
Answered by the Kirkpatrick rollup
I do not need another dashboard of red. I need the three gaps that actually matter and a way to close them this quarter.
HR HR director300-person services firm
Answered by honest gaps and closing tracks
If eNPS is not truly anonymous, it is fiction. The floor has to be built into the tool, not promised in an email.
PL People lead90-person scale-up
Answered by the anonymity floor

Role-attributed lines from our research, not named customers. When we have customer logos, they will be real ones, with permission.

We did not invent a metric. We report the ones your board already trusts.

Kirkpatrick, 1959

The four levels of training evaluation. Reaction, learning, behavior, results. Still the standard your leadership learned.

Phillips ROI

Adds the fifth level and puts a dollar figure on the program, so learning finally speaks the language of the P and L.

Employee eNPS

The honest read on how people feel about the work and the learning behind it, gathered with an anonymity floor.

Bayesian Knowledge Tracing

The mastery model. A defensible probability per skill from real signals, never a completion bar dressed up as progress.

for HR and L&D leaders

Your first honest board pack is waiting.

Four levels, one dollar figure, and only the gaps that need a decision. Omie runs on the web and on mobile with one account, so the learning happens wherever your people are.

No card to start. The screens are real, the figures on them illustrative.