Docs-as-Code AI Review Deck
Recall the docs-as-code review checks for AI-assisted documentation changes.
PR minimum What should an AI-assisted docs PR description include? Source evidence, scope of generated change, preview link, and reviewer needed for factual claims. These fields let reviewers separate style review from product verification. Objection The docs build passed, so this AI update is safe to merge. A teammate points to green checks as proof. Your line Green checks prove the site builds. They do not prove the new claims match product behavior. Let's verify the factual changes against the linked source. Build success can hide wrong but valid text. It respects automation while naming its boundary. Review shape What…
Sign up free — one personalized lesson every day, matched to your role and goals.
Already have an account? Sign in