Distinguish continuous AI co-working from explicit centaur handoffs and choose the cleaner workflow for reviewable work.
Mei's executive brief is fluent but hard to audit. What changed in the better workflow? Before: one blended thread, no clean handoffs. After: bounded AI jobs, human review gates. Handoffs are named. AI extracts and drafts; Mei verifies and decides. That makes the centaur split visible. Sources travel with claims. The output can be audited because every major claim points back to the material AI used. Judgment is separated from polish. AI can improve wording without silently changing the risk call. The frontier is checked by subtask. Each step asks whether AI is inside or outside its reliable zone. The…
Sign up free — one personalized lesson every day, matched to your role and goals.
Already have an account? Sign in