Stop the rubber-stamp review
Write a reviewer instruction that elicits evidence-based correction instead of passive approval.
Nina is coaching a reviewer who keeps clicking approve on AI refund replies. Pick the line that creates real review. The reviewer has been approving drafts quickly. I checked that it sounded polite, so I approved it. fromTop The manager reframes the review task. fromBottom Before approving, compare the draft against the exception rule and mark what you changed or why no change was needed. Strong. It names the criterion, requires active comparison, and captures correction data. Please slow down and be more careful on these reviews. Weak. It asks for effort, but gives no evidence standard or feedback structure.…
Sign up free — one personalized lesson every day, matched to your role and goals.
Already have an account? Sign in