Use SMART-style criteria to review quota specificity, measurability, assignability, realism, and timing.
SMART What does SMART test in a quota review? Stretch quota versus fictional quota The difference is not ambition. It is whether the path can be inspected. The board target requires this quota, so realism is not negotiable. Leadership pressure can turn planning math into field cynicism. Your line We can keep the growth ambition, but each quota still needs visible assumptions so managers can coach the path and identify structural gaps early. Treating quota as pure top-down allocation. It protects ambition while insisting on an inspectable operating model. What should trigger a quota review after launch? Material territory change,…
Sign up free — one personalized lesson every day, matched to your role and goals.
Already have an account? Sign in