Review Response Battlecards
Use concise response patterns for common pull request review situations.
Reviewer: "This breaks an edge case." Your line Good catch. I intended to preserve that path, but your example shows a gap. I will add a regression test for it and request re-review after the check passes. Starting with why the ticket did not mention it. AAR compares intended and actual behavior, then moves to next action. Reviewer: "Why did you choose this approach?" Background: I chose it to avoid changing the public API. Assessment: the trade-off is extra adapter code. Request: can you check whether that trade-off is acceptable for this package? Answering with "because it works" or dumping…
Sign up free — one personalized lesson every day, matched to your role and goals.
Already have an account? Sign in