From Review Pile to Review Packet
Describe how review-loop artifacts make an AI-generated patch easier to approve or reject.
What changed when the calendar reminder patch became reviewable? Before: polished wall of change. After: focused review packet. Scope moved from broad file churn to reminder-scheduler files, because review loops should judge the named change instead of incidental cleanup. The reproduction test is attached to the patch, so the reviewer can connect the fix to the original bug without trusting the agent's confidence. The targeted run is visible before review, which turns "it probably works" into evidence. A risk note names what was not solved, so follow-up work does not get smuggled into approval. Make the diff tell one story…
Sign up free — one personalized lesson every day, matched to your role and goals.
Already have an account? Sign in