Design a repeatable Claude Code workflow for PR triage using a worker for evidence gathering and an evaluator loop for quality.
The team asks Claude Code to triage a queue of PRs every week, but each run gathers slightly different evidence and emphasizes different review criteria. Standardize evidence packet -> specialize retrieval worker -> critique against checklist -> reuse The trap is thinking the inconsistency comes from wording alone. Often the real problem is that the workflow never fixed what data should be gathered first or what review bar the draft must pass before it is useful. Step 1 Define the evidence packet: changed files, PR description, linked issue, test results, and risk markers. The task now has a stable retrieval…
Sign up free — one personalized lesson every day, matched to your role and goals.
Already have an account? Sign in