Worked Example: Use a Worker to Compare Repo Code Against Figma
Build a Claude Code workflow that pulls design truth through MCP and still ends with local verification.
The team is debating a UI mismatch using screenshots and memory. Claude Code has the component code but not the approved design state that determines whether the patch is right. Name the external gap -> connect the source -> compare precisely -> patch locally -> verify locally The common trap is asking Claude Code to "make it match the mock" without giving it the design authority. That forces the agent to work from paraphrase, which means even a careful patch may optimize toward the wrong state. Step 1 State the gap: "The repo has the component, but Figma has the…
Sign up free — one personalized lesson every day, matched to your role and goals.
Already have an account? Sign in