Map Taxonomy Alignment Without Overclaiming
Differentiate taxonomy eligibility from alignment and avoid overstating sustainable revenue.
Translate a company's 'taxonomy relevant' revenue claim into a careful alignment statement. Eligible activity -> substantial contribution -> do no significant harm -> minimum safeguards -> aligned revenue The common trap is calling all eligible revenue sustainable. That collapses a screening framework into a marketing claim. Identify eligible revenue 72% of revenue comes from activities covered by the taxonomy sectors. Eligibility means the activity can be assessed. It does not yet mean it qualifies as environmentally sustainable. Apply technical screening 35% of revenue meets substantial-contribution thresholds for the relevant environmental objective. Technical criteria turn broad relevance into evidence-based contribution. Check…
Sign up free — one personalized lesson every day, matched to your role and goals.
Already have an account? Sign in