Task Audit Pocket Deck
Recall the core task-audit distinctions for automation-proof work design.
battlecard What is the first task-audit question? Start with Autor. Is this task routine enough to specify, measure, and repeat reliably? Stable inputs and explicit rules make automation safer. Ambiguous context means a human layer remains. Routine speed vs human leverage Both matter. The risk is confusing one for the other. We should automate this whole workflow. A meeting where scope is expanding too fast. Argue for or against automation in general. Boundary line Let's split routine steps from judgment steps, then automate the stable layer first. It keeps momentum while protecting accountability. What makes a task a career-capital rep?…
Sign up free: one personalized lesson every day, matched to your role and goals.
Already have an account? Sign in